<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tech-Explained on cloudmato.com</title><link>https://cloudmato.com/tags/tech-explained/</link><description>Recent content in Tech-Explained on cloudmato.com</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>cloudmato.com</managingEditor><webMaster>cloudmato.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:28:20 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cloudmato.com/tags/tech-explained/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>MacBook Text vs Monitor: Why Resolution Numbers Lie</title><link>https://cloudmato.com/posts/macbook-text-crispy-monitor-pixel-density/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:28:20 +0530</pubDate><author>cloudmato.com</author><guid>https://cloudmato.com/posts/macbook-text-crispy-monitor-pixel-density/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You buy a Full HD (1920×1080) monitor and check the specs. Your MacBook also outputs to a similar resolution. Yet when you start working, the text on the monitor looks noticeably softer. Not broken or unreadable — just not as sharp as what you see on your MacBook&amp;rsquo;s built-in screen. What&amp;rsquo;s going on?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The answer isn&amp;rsquo;t about resolution numbers. &lt;strong&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s about pixel density.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Pixel Density Problem&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s the thing: two displays with the same resolution at different sizes will have completely different pixel densities [1]. A 24-inch Full HD monitor has roughly &lt;strong&gt;92 pixels per inch (PPI)&lt;/strong&gt; [2]. Your MacBook Air? Try &lt;strong&gt;227 PPI&lt;/strong&gt; [1]. Your 16-inch MacBook Pro? &lt;strong&gt;254 PPI&lt;/strong&gt; [1].&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why QR Codes Have Three Squares in the Corners</title><link>https://cloudmato.com/posts/why-qr-codes-have-three-squares/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 22:52:40 +0530</pubDate><author>cloudmato.com</author><guid>https://cloudmato.com/posts/why-qr-codes-have-three-squares/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Scan a QR code every day and never once think about those three squares. I was in that category for years. Turns out they are doing some genuinely clever engineering work — and the reason there are exactly &lt;em&gt;three&lt;/em&gt;, not four, is more interesting than you&amp;rsquo;d expect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 class="header-anchor-wrapper"&gt;They Have a Name: Finder Patterns
&lt;a href="#they-have-a-name-finder-patterns" class="header-anchor-link"&gt;
&lt;svg
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
width="1rem" height="1rem" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none"
stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round"
stroke-linejoin="round"&gt;
&lt;line x1="4" y1="9" x2="20" y2="9"&gt;&lt;/line&gt;&lt;line x1="4" y1="15" x2="20" y2="15"&gt;&lt;/line&gt;&lt;line x1="10" y1="3" x2="8" y2="21"&gt;&lt;/line&gt;&lt;line x1="16" y1="3" x2="14" y2="21"&gt;&lt;/line&gt;
&lt;/svg&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cloudmato.com/images/posts/why-qr-codes-have-three-squares/qr-feature.svg" alt="qr-code-finder-pattern"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>