<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Agents on cloudmato.com</title><link>https://cloudmato.com/tags/agents/</link><description>Recent content in Agents on cloudmato.com</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>cloudmato.com</managingEditor><webMaster>cloudmato.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:37:11 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cloudmato.com/tags/agents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Loops in AI: What They Are and Why Everyone's Talking</title><link>https://cloudmato.com/posts/loops-in-ai-explained/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:37:11 +0530</pubDate><author>cloudmato.com</author><guid>https://cloudmato.com/posts/loops-in-ai-explained/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ask three people what &amp;ldquo;loop&amp;rdquo; means in AI right now and you&amp;rsquo;ll get three different answers. One will say the agent loop. Another will start talking about model collapse and feedback loops. A third will mention human-in-the-loop from some compliance meeting. They&amp;rsquo;re all correct, which is exactly why the word has become so confusing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been writing software for over 8 years, and I&amp;rsquo;ve watched plenty of jargon get recycled. But &amp;ldquo;loop&amp;rdquo; is special because it&amp;rsquo;s not one trend — it&amp;rsquo;s at least four different ideas that all happen to share the same word, and all of them got hot at roughly the same time. So let me untangle them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>